Stefan Biffl

Prof. Stefan Biffl

  • E-Mail
  • Phone: +43 (1) 58801 18810
  • Fax: +43 (1) 58801 18899

Bio

Stefan Biffl is an associate professor of software engineering at the Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Technische Universität Wien.
He received MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the Vienna University of Technology and an MS degree in social and economic sciences from the University of Vienna. In 2001 Stefan received an Erwin-Schrödinger research scholarship and spent one year as researcher at the Fraunhofer Institute of Experimental Software Engineering (headed by Dieter Rombach), focusing on quality management and empirical software engineering. Also, in 2001 he received the Habilitation degree (Venia Docendi) in “Praktische Informatik” for work on empirical software engineering in project management and quality management. In 2006 he worked as guest researcher at Czech Technical University, Department of Cybernetics (headed by Vladimir Marik).

For more information please see http://qse.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~biffl/

Publications

  • Stefan Biffl and Gernot Goluch and Dietmar Winkler and Ramona Varvaroi, "An Empirical Study On Integrating Analytical Quality Assurance Into Pair Programming," in Proceedings of 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2006. BibTeX
    @INPROCEEDINGS{Winkler_EmpiricalStudyIntegrating_2006,
      Author = {Stefan Biffl and Gernot Goluch and Dietmar Winkler and Ramona Varvaroi},
      title = {An Empirical Study On Integrating Analytical Quality Assurance Into Pair Programming},
      booktitle = {Proceedings of 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering},
      year = {2006},
      month = {1},
      abstract = {The success of software projects depends on the ability of a human planner to understand the relationships of tasks and their temporal uncertainty and hence the visualization thereof. In this paper we report on an empirical study that compares the performance of two techniques to visualize task relationships and temporal uncertainties: traditional ``best-practice'' PERT charts and recently introduced PlanningLines. Main results of the study are: (a) while PERT charts are well suited for reading single attributes, PlanningLines better support users in judging temporal task uncertainty; (b) both experiment rounds shows consistent results regarding the strengths and limitations of the techniques. Overall, these results suggest that a combination of PERT charts and PlanningLines has the potential to significantly improve the planning support of project managers and software engineers.},
      }
  • Edgar R. Weippl and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer, "Digital Signatures with Familiar Appearance for e-Government Documents: Authentic PDF," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES’06), 2006, pp. 723-731. BibTeX
    @INPROCEEDINGS{Neubauer_DigitalSignatureswith_2006,
      Author = {{Edgar R.} Weippl and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer},
      title = {Digital Signatures with Familiar Appearance for e-Government Documents: Authentic PDF},
      booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'06)},
      year = {2006},
      month = {1},
      pages = {723-731},
      }
  • Markus Klemen and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer, "Secure Business Process Management: A Roadmap," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), 2006, pp. 457-464. BibTeX
    @INPROCEEDINGS{Neubauer_SecureBusinessProcess_2006,
      Author = {Markus Klemen and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer},
      title = {Secure Business Process Management: A Roadmap},
      booktitle = {Proceedings of the First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)},
      year = {2006},
      month = {1},
      pages = {457--464},
      publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
      }
  • Markus Klemen and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer, "Business Process-based Valuation of IT-Security," in International ACM Conference on Software Engineering, Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on economics-driven software engineering research (EDSER’05), 2005. BibTeX
    @INPROCEEDINGS{Neubauer_BusinessProcessbasedValuation_2005,
      Author = {Markus Klemen and Stefan Biffl and Thomas Neubauer},
      title = {Business {P}rocess-based {V}aluation of {IT}-{S}ecurity},
      booktitle = {International {ACM} {C}onference on {S}oftware {E}ngineering, {P}roceedings of the seventh international workshop on economics-driven software engineering research ({EDSER}'05)},
      year = {2005},
      month = {1},
      }
  • Stefan Biffl and Gernot Goluch and Silvia Miksch and Bettina Thurnher and Dietmar Winkler and Wolfgang Aigner, "An Empirical investigation on the Visualization of Temporal Uncertainties in Software Engineering Project Planning," in Proceedings of 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005. BibTeX
    @INPROCEEDINGS{Biffl_EmpiricalinvestigationVisualization_2005,
      Author = {Stefan Biffl and Gernot Goluch and Silvia Miksch and Bettina Thurnher and Dietmar Winkler and Wolfgang Aigner},
      title = {An Empirical investigation on the Visualization of Temporal Uncertainties in Software Engineering Project Planning},
      booktitle = {Proceedings of 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering},
      year = {2005},
      month = {1},
      abstract = {The success of software projects depends on the ability of a human planner to understand the relationships of tasks and their temporal uncertainty and hence the visualization thereof. In this paper we report on an empirical study that compares the performance of two techniques to visualize task relationships and temporal uncertainties: traditional ``best-practice'' PERT charts and recently introduced PlanningLines. Main results of the study are: (a) while PERT charts are well suited for reading single attributes, PlanningLines better support users in judging temporal task uncertainty; (b) both experiment rounds shows consistent results regarding the strengths and limitations of the techniques. Overall, these results suggest that a combination of PERT charts and PlanningLines has the potential to significantly improve the planning support of project managers and software engineers.},
      }

View all publications